Apple Rejecting Google Voice a diversion?

voice-main-video

Perhaps Apple was right in stating that the Google Voice app implemented functionality already in the iPhone…  iPhone 3.1 !

Google and Apple could be cooperating to make Google Voice a native app, with all the advantages to Google: seamless operation of a native app, and available on every iPhone that come with or is upgraded to 3.1.

I think Google is eying the market penetration of the iPhone and would like to get its apps on every single one of these phones. And a Google Voice web app could not provide quite the user experience of a native app.

  • Google Voice considered a cool app. Hard to believe that Apple would such an app on their phone, making it a less desirable product. And Apple’s strategy has always been to sell hardware.
  • Google seems less annoyed about this that one might expect (perhaps Google is not ready for the onslaught of users from the iPhone user base…yet!).
  • Google and Apple are natural allies against each have something to fear from Microsoft: Google search only has market share to lose to Bing, especially with the Yahoo deal. And the immanent release of Windows 7 must concern Apple.
  • Google has cooperated with Apple before on Google maps and YouTube videos.
  • Google Voice could come out of invite-mode simultaneously with the next Apple announcement. The timing seems right.
  • MobileMe has been a PR disaster for Apple. Wouldn’t it make sense to somehow integrate MobileMe with Google or Google Docs? Perhaps the new iTablet could come with built-in support for Google Gears/Google Docs as an office app strategy.
  • Less emphasis by Google on Android with the introduction of Google Chrome OS, which is much more of a threat to Microsoft than to Apple.
  • Perhaps all this banning-Google-Latitude/rejecting-Google-Voice/Schmidt-stepping-down-from-the-board is just a smokescreen to heighten the surprise of this Google/Apple cooperation (check Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin travel plans on the day of the Apple fall announcement).

All fantasy or could any of this come to pass. What do you think?

iTablet: Steve Jobs Checklist part II

Continuing my previous post here are further checklist items for Steve Jobs to insist on in developing and marketing the iTablet:

iTablet

iTablet

  • Must implement a feature that you said you would never do and make it a key feature of the device (Just like the “No Video Ipod” Video iPod). Perhaps the “Kindle is flawed because people don’t read” Ebook Reader?
  • Must remember to annoy early adopters by significantly dropping the price a month after the release, when the lines in front of the Apple store have shortened, and the shortages have ended.
  • Must assure that the iTablet is totally incompatible with previous iPhone, iPod, Mac accessories.
  • Must assure that only licensed accessories work with the iTablet.
  • Must require a new version of iTunes, that will work even worse on Windows machines (if possible!).
  • Must remember to charge $10 to future OS upgrades, and blame it on accounting.

Photo attribution

The iTablet: The Steve Jobs checklist.

iTablet

iTablet

From what we can glean from past experience, especially in Apple’s consumer products like the iPod and iPhone,  the iTablet must adhere to the following :

  • Must be a fashion statement. Just like the introduction of the conspicuous mug-me-white earbuds of the iPods.
  • Must be obscenely expensive. Not much to say about that!
  • Must need to be handled a lot in its operation and in doing so be obvious to others, to show the owner’s coolness and good taste (and for its free viral marketing contribution to Apple). The original iPod clickwheel, and the multi-touch screens of the other devices come to mind.
  • Must be missing at least one but likely many crucial features, to be introduced in releases 2,3,4… Just like the lack voice dialing, cut and paste, stereo bluetooth, 3G, etc. etc. on the first iPhone)
  • Must wear out quickly in some way needing one to upgrade to the next version, like the scratch-prone screens of the first ipods, and the fragile glass screens of the present generation of iPhone/iPod Touch.
  • Form over function is everything!
  • …and much, much more that I haven’t thought of.

Photo Attribution

In praise of push buttons: my podcast player.

In praise of pushbuttons

In praise of push buttons: my podcast player

I use my mobile phone (iPAQ rw6828) as my podcast/music/audiobook device.

Why? Because of push buttons.

With the buttons on the phone I can:

  • play/pause and stop the track
  • skip forward (great for skipping those interminable twit ads).
  • skip back (to re-listen to a bit drowned out by traffic noise on my walks.
  • go to previous/next track
  • control the volume
  • go to the next playlist (to alternate between music/podcasts/audiobooks)
  • Toggle the touchscreen on and off

The volume/play/pase/stop/next track/previous track I can also do from my bluetooth headset.

I do have an iPod Touch but it isn’t my main podcast device because you have to fiddle with it too much to do much of the above. I am especially annoyed with the Touch bluetooth support that doesn’t include previous/next functions. Hopefully this will be fixed in a subsequent release.

My the way, the phone runs Windows Mobile OS and the great MortPlayer application

(Photo by williamli1983)

When can DRM be justified?

I had attended the recent Canadian Copyright Consultations Montreal Town Hall. It was very interesting to see the wide range of positions on copyright.

I’ve been reading a little and thinking about DRM. I don’t think DRM is a good thing, but even so, there are probably some areas where it makes some sense. I can think of two:

  1. Subscription services: Paying, say, a monthly fee for access to content. And that access ends when one stops paying for it.
  2. Trial software.

There may be other cases that justify it and certainly there is an argument that DRM is not justified even in these cases.

New iPod, iTablet, nixing Google Voice: Coincidence? I don’t think so.

Now that the pundits have spoken, here are the thoughts of a rank amateur on the forthcoming iPods and iTablet (with apologies to others with similar ideas):

  • The new iPod Touch will have a microphone and a forward-facing camera, used for VoIP calls over Wi-Fi with a native app. The app together with Verizon will be Google Voice-like supporting video with social networking flavor.
  • When away from a Wi-Fi hotspot, the Touch will  connect to the Verizon 3G network using:… the iTablet.
  • The iTablet will support tethering. It will be have fantastic battery life, and will be always on, even when in your backpack/purse, remotely accessible by your new iPod Touch (as well as older Touches or iPhones). It together with an iPod touch would support cellular-like calling over 3G. It would take a Steve Jobs to convince Verizon that the days of cell phones are numbered and that VoIP over 3G is the way to go, especially for video calls.
  • The iTablet will run iTunes. It must irk Steve Jobs that most copies of iTunes run on Windows despite Apple’s herculean efforts to make the Windows version run like a dog (very successful by the way). The iTablet will be an alternative that even Windows fanboys might be tempted to buy.
  • The iTablet will come with an thin and  light  Bluetooth keyboard. It can be used as an alternative to the touch screen.  The iTablet then can be propped up more vertically on its self-contained stand for more convenient viewing  (and to be better seen by the Starbucks crowd, as per Apple’s usual viral marketing genius).
  • The iTablet won’t be cheap, despite being subsidized by a data plan. Maybe $499 subsidized? But as always, fanboys will ignore the exorbitant monthly charges and compare the $499 to the price of  the cheapest Mac and think they are getting a wonderful bargain. Gee, thanks Steve.
  • The iTablet will have a large storage capacity for your music/video collection (and ebooks?)  and will always be online via the 3G network, replacing the functionality of the to-be-discontinued iPod Classic line.

I figure, why should only the experts have all the fun of having egg on their face, once these devices are  released with features that blow everybody away!

Tracking my morning walk with the iPod Touch

In investigating the iPod Touch location services functionality, I came across the Instamapper GPS Tracker app. It was meant to be used with the iPhone and it uses the location service to locate the iPhone and transmit its location to Instamapper where it is displayed on a google map.

I was able to cajole it to run on my iPod Touch (it can buffer up to 100 points) and took my Touch on my walk yesterday morning. I live in Montreal in the NDG area. I walked in NDG/Hampstead. This is the result:

My Morning walk in Montreal (Hampstead/NDG area)

My Morning walk in Montreal (Hampstead/NDG area)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.